there are MANY similarities in this line and this story. both have been talking of love . is really just the charm of a joke to confirm the name of love , it is love. well T.S. ELIOT 'S POEM of ' the wasteland' in showing to in this situation. when Eliot is uses of his poem in love , nature and emotion . at that words using of this short story . in this story in showing to love, nature and emotion ,because most of seen that love is always connected with nature . many love story in seen that beautiful natures . without nature not improving to love emotion , the nature is a beautiful season. so its called to archetypal situation. were in this story in heroin ' NADIA ' WAS feel to loving situation and her friend is not understand her feelings. he was always confused to her feeling is love or not so , its really joke or not a joke , only true love or only attraction , but its very confusing situation . and in this story refusing to archetypal criticism.
Saturday, 30 September 2017
Online discussion 1. Oneness literature
Shitla satam & rakshabandha ,online discussion 2
Rakshabandha is celebrated by everyone and this is a festival of culture. But what Neha shah has done here is really like thinking. Because the brother get the same importance as a result, the importance of the sister decreases, our country is a male minister, so Always the woman has to depand on the man .so what brother will protect sister. She depand on this have presented this matter here in this festival.
My own example I will give us. here I have not a brother. Even if we are only two sister, we celebrate this festival and we are both sister's in their own right.
Now the talk is of the shitla satam festival. This festival is associated with a belief. It is said that due to the festivities of shitla satam, the skin disease and chickenpox are eroded, but in reality, this disease is eliminated from the drug's made for it.
Young India, New India
At department of English in M.k. bhavnager, event of the online webcast arranged and students have been listen Pm 's speech on the main theme of ' young India, New India '. Then Pm modi 's speech is consult of resurgent of the nation through the Young generation.
Well modi ji promoting swami vivekanand 's ideas threw to the New generation. It about also that modi was critical evaluated to vivekanand 's thing's.
He said that 'every Indian should not be a job seeker but should be job giver' in this he has expressed his views that we can make India better and developed if Youngsters are skilful and talented because our country is also one of that which have more population of young people.
Review of the pay 'Yugpurush '
" Yugpurush Mahatama na Mahatama " very knowledgeable play. This was celebrate 150th anniversary of srimadji . This play organized in many country and city.
My department of English were participated in This event at yashvantray natyagruh.
This play most based on the life of Gandhi and his guru Rajchadra. This play performed in flashback technique.
This play shows the most important part of Gandhi ji 's life, that how Mohan became Mahatama. Gandhi ji 's thing's of ahinsa ,sataygrah, brahmacharay vrat is a purely guide of life .
So as a student of literature we learned many things from this play.
Talk with Gujarati author Mahendra shin Parma
On the Friday, 15 th September 2017, Department of English M.K. bhavnager university has arranged a session with Gujarati short story writer Prof. Mahendra shin Parmar .his short stories is a very popular in a now days. His famous two short stories is :
1: ' polytechnic '
2: ' Udanchakardi '
We got to here both of these stories from their mouth. And this was a very special moment for us because it is rare to see that an author presents his own story with his opinion.
His polytechnic story seemed to be very difficult to published and present to us because the subject matter of the story itself is mild, but in other words this topic is a serious issue of present time. Polytechnic stories main theme is 'Sulabh sauchalay ' and the sauchalay (toilet) is also attached to the cleanliness. This story polytechnic with connection of the Hindi movie ' toilet - ek pream katha '.
This story introduced the difficulties of the woman's for the toilet and this shortstory has been told about the polytechnic ground of bhavnager city. This is a very useful ground for woman.
Last year ,we have talk on 'intellectual Indubhai ' short story written by him . Well this story and film between in I found that the film is failed against this story. Because story in uses to pure languages and story given to massage. I very liked this story .
Friday, 29 September 2017
Thinking activity of t. S .Eliot 's poem the wasteland
1. Yes , Nietzsche and Eliot between in many differences . They both are German philosopher, but Nietzsche 's thinking is properly change again Eliot 's thinking. Nietzsche not believe in to God and he says that 'God is died'. He was believe in to human's ability. And his point of view about then the progressive of human life and their formality.his think of a logical ways. Well Nietzsche with the concept of 'Ubermensch' means ' superhuman ',so he seems to be progressive and forward looking in giving solution to the problems of contemporary crisis. Nietzsche opposite Eliot was purely believe in to the God and myths. When Eliot looking about to the God, myths and religious way and it's past.in this poem of 'the wasteland ' in Eliot viewing about the 'Buddhism''Buddhism','christ','Hinduism, various rituals words are uses ,so Eliot was getting to past and history of myths.
2. The second point in discussed to the ' primitive instincts ' repressive to satisfied life. When Eliot believe in the human law and rituals. ,his opposite fraud belives in the individualism, so fraud 's point of view that primitive instincts and happy satisfied life depanded to the individuality, on the other side Eliot mentioned to salvation lies in the preservation of cultural tradition .
3. In this poem 'the wasteland' in Eliot mentioned to various myths, cultures and mostly uses to mythical words about sharing to universal thought and rituals languages. Eliot express to Buddhism, Christianity, Indian myths and most of explaining to sexual perversion and spiritual degradation in found to European civilization.
Then this poem 's last part in Eliot refers to 'Upnishads''Upnishads' of Indian culture and rituals.
At the last stanza in he uses 'shantih, shantih, shantih ', in this last line expressed to peace of the mind .
Thursday, 28 September 2017
Pehredaar Piya Ki. Is it progressive or regressive? Ban Pehredaar Piya ki. Why?
Respected sir ,
' Pehredaar piya ki ' is now days in a very controversial serial. The serial 'Pehredaar piya ki ' on Sony tv shows a 10 year boy married to 19 year young girl.
Well this show's title 'Pehredaar piya ki ' is suggested to that 'Pehredaar' means protector and 'piya ' means husband. So protector of husband. Generally we all knows that the society and culture in woman 's are mentally and physically depending to the man and man's are always protecting the woman's .but at that time in this thinking are suddenly changed. This show through reflected this ideas.
First of all this show is released to two themes
1: child marriage
2: feminism
In the First theme of the child marriage is a correctly showing to This show. The society does not accepted This child marriage but media shows This kind of things. So negative people'people's are request to ban this serial because this serial is presenting to this theme of the child marriage. So it's regressive point. Many serial 's are came with this theme.
In the second point is feminism. Well see the serial in feminism perspective of view . In this show 's heroin Diya is a protecter of her husband. She is suffer against to the rule of culture .her always saving to ratan .so Diya as a protecter and very brave girl. She is growing and rising in the cultural moment. She is raise her voice against to evils things and people's. So it's progressive point.
In this show 's two sides : good & BAD . WE can see in the good side so we can like and accepted this things but we can see in the bad side so we can't like about this show. But we can correctly choosing to depended.
Queen 's interview in 'aap ki adalat'
The hot topic of these days is Kangna Ranaut's exclusive interview with Rajat Sharma on #aapkiadalat on India TV. She really Rocked it. This is so inspirational that she came out of so many troubles and struggle to achieve the place where she is now. Really she gave us the harsh reality of Bollywood and some superstar celebs. It is must watch show!!! And I am glad that this interview was shown in Our department of English. Amazing day!!! #KanganaRocked
This interview is deeply connected to feminism. And kangna was such a real queen of her own life. She's inspiring to woman's.
Sunday, 10 September 2017
thinking activity for the play of ' waiting for godot '
RESPECTED SIR ,
Q.1 . What Connection do you see in the setting (''A country road A tree evening '') of the play and these paintings ?
ans. yes, that the connection between this painting and the setting of this play . this painting's look is closely related to this setting of the play . well in the setting ''A country road '' means way of god , and ''A tree evening '' means as a tree is looking like a cross.even sun also rising , so it means rising to hope.again that this painting's name is ' Longing' but Beckett uses 'Waiting'. and Longing means waiting .so Beckett says that ''waiting for Godot '', so in this painting and in the setting of this play describes to they two persons are waiting for the god.
Q.2 . IN both acts , evening falls in to night and Moon rises ,How would you like to interpret this ' coming of night and moon' when actually they are waiting for Godot?
ans. In this both acts , Evening falls in to night and moon rises then the night is signified to 'end' so the nature continuously passes of the time ,that the nature never wait for the time and everything and natural necessary non-stop ,working in own way .but at that situation in the human hope is not died .they are continuously waiting for Godot.
Q.3.The tree is the only important 'thing' in the setting .What is the importance of tree in both acts ? Why does Beckett grow a few leaves in act 2 on the barren tree - The tree has four or five leaves.
ans. yes , the tree is important symbol in the both acts ,in the first act the barren tree is growing a few leaves ,that it means 'hope ' and the tree suggested to the second world war and in the act -2 on the barren tree has four or five leaves grow , so its means they are continuously hope about the waiting for the GOD.
Q.4. The Director feels the setting with some debris .can you read any meaning in the contours of debris in the setting of the play ?
ans. yes, i can read in the setting of the play on some debris .first of all Debris means ,'Destroyed', 'Brokenness', 'Emptiness' so something is brooked it and destroyed, its symbol of second world war and the Director was shown the setting of this play in destroyed place , not seen in to this play the beautiful nature ,but we can see in this plays atmosphere and stoned-place. so its symbol of debris.
Q.5. The play begins with the dialogue ''Nothing to be done ''. How does the theme of 'Nothingness' recurse in the play ?
ans. The play begins with the dialogue ''Nothing to be done '' in this plays main theme is 'Nothingness' .we can see this play in all characters are doing meaningless and unreasonable activities.
Q.6 How are the props like Hat and Boots used in the play ? what is the symbolic significance of these props ?
ans. this two props is very related to this play .in this two props with compare two characters .well Hat represented to intellectual thinking .so Vladimir plays with Hat and he think logically .and other way in Boots represented thinking without logic , unnecessary thinking ,so Estragon plays with Boot ,and his thinking unlogical.
Q.7Do you agree: ''The play ( waiting for Godot ) we agreed ,was a positive play ,not negative ,not pessimistic ,as i saw it with my blood and skin and eyes ,the philosophy is ; ''no matter what - atom bombs , anything - life goes on you can kill yourself ,but you can't kill life ,'' (E.G. Marshal who played Vladimir in original Broadway production 1950's )?
ans.yes , i agree , this play ' waiting for GODOT' was a positive play , because this play in showing that , what is reality of life and every movements , all characters are doing nothing activities in our way . this plays theme is purely proved .then Vladimir and estrogen 's logic was not clear and their thinking mirror of nothingness , but also that their hope for the waiting of god is not died .so its very significant.
Q.8 . Which of the following sequence you liked the most ....
ans. i like the most sequence of Lucky's speech and the conversation of Vladimir with the boy .
thank you .....
Thursday, 7 September 2017
Postcolonialism
Postcolonialism
By definition, postcolonialism is a period of time after colonialism, and postcolonial literature is typically characterized by its opposition to the colonial. However, some critics have argued that any literature that expresses an opposition to colonialism, even if it is produced during a colonial period, may be defined as postcolonial, primarily due to its oppositional nature. Postcolonial literature often focuses on race relations and the effects of racism and usually indicts white and/or colonial societies. Despite a basic consensus on the general themes of postcolonial writing, however, there is ongoing debate regarding the meaning of postcolonialism. Many critics now propose that the term should be expanded to include the literatures of Canada, the United States, and Australia. In his essay discussing the nature and boundaries of postcolonialism, Simon During argues for a more inclusive definition, calling it “the need, in nations, or groups which have been victims of imperialism to achieve an identity uncontaminated by universalist or Eurocentric concepts or images.” The scale and scope of modern European imperialism, as well as its extraordinarily organized character, including the cultural licensing of racial domination, has sometimes led to the perception of colonization as a modern phenomenon. In fact, many critics propose that modern colonialism was not a discrete occurrence and that an examination of premodern colonial activities will allow for a greater and more complex understanding of modern structures of power and domination, serving to illuminate the operation of older histories in the context of both modern colonialism and contemporary race and global political relations.
Works of literature that are defined as postcolonial often record racism or a history of genocide, including slavery, apartheid, and the mass extinction of peoples, such as the Aborigines in Australia. Critical response to these texts is often seen as an important way to articulate and negotiate communication between writers who define themselves as postcolonial and critics who are not part of that experience. In her introduction to Post-Colonial and African American Women's Writing, published in 2000, Gina Wisker notes that the indictment present in many postcolonial texts tends to produce guilt or feelings of inherited complicity in many readers. Also, although writing about these texts may raise the level of awareness of both the texts and their writers, some postcolonial writers see reflected in this activity an arrogant assumption about the need for noncolonial cultures to recognize postcolonial writers. Similarly, other critics have noted that critical response that focuses entirely on the essential nature of black or Asian writers may also serve to marginalize their writing by supposing their experiences as largely a product of being “other” than European.
Postcolonialism includes a vast array of writers and subjects. In fact, the very different geographical, historical, social, religious, and economic concerns of the different ex-colonies dictate a wide variety in the nature and subject of most postcolonial writing. Wisker has noted in her book that it is even simplistic to theorize that all postcolonial writing is resistance writing. In fact, many postcolonial writers themselves will argue that their countries are still very much colonial countries, both in terms of their values and behaviors, and that these issues are reflected in their work. In her essay on postcolonialism, Deepika Bahri agrees, noting that while the definition of postcolonialism may be fairly boundaried, the actual use of the term is very subjective, allowing for a yoking together of a very diverse range of experiences, cultures, and problems. This diversity of definitions exists, notes Bahri, because the term postcolonialism is used both as a literal description of formerly colonial societies and as a description of global conditions after a period of colonialism. In this regard, according to Bahri, the notion of the “postcolonial” as a literary genre and an academic construct may have meanings that are completely separate from a historical moment or time period.
Some women colonial writers draw a relationship between postcolonialism and feminism. For many of these writers, who live in strong patriarchal cultures, language and the ability to write and communicate represent power. Some of these writers, for example, have noted that since the language of British-ruled colonies is English, literature written in English has often been used to marginalize and constrain female points of view. In the postcolonial period, however, language, and the ability to speak, write, and publish, has become an enabling tool for postcolonial authors.